|
Phoenix Office
20827 N. Cave Creek Rd.,
Ste. 101
Phoenix, Arizona 85024
602-482-4300
SEE MAP
Tucson Office
5055 E. Broadway Blvd.,
Ste. C214
Tucson, Arizona 85711
520-624-3009
SEE MAP
Flagstaff Office
1300 S. Milton Rd., Ste. 209
Flagstaff, Arizona 86001
928-774-2310
SEE MAP
Las
Vegas Office
2000 S. Eastern Ave. Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
702-732-4410
SEE MAP
|
|
|
|

Scott E. Davis,
Disability Attorney
Welcome to the law
firm of Scott E. Davis. We focus on representing clients who
are disabled due to chronic pain or fatigue. The firm has
earned an excellent reputation nationwide for providing
quality legal representation that is both aggressive in legal
strategy and compassionate toward our clients' concerns.
Chronic pain and chronic fatigue disability
cases are generally more difficult to win because the
diagnoses are often viewed with skepticism or are poorly
understood by medical and legal professionals. For this
reason, it is important to choose a law firm that concentrates
in your type of diagnosis and has a solid record of success.
If you are considering filing a disability claim, please
contact us for a free telephone consultation.
Whether or not you select us to represent
you, we hope you'll find our website to be a valuable resource
as you pursue your disability claim. Remember: winning any
disability case requires persistence and determination; it is
critical you do not quit and keep fighting for the benefits
you deserve!
Scott E. Davis
is currently accepting new clients only from the states of
Arizona and Nevada.
|
|
|
| LEGAL DISCLAIMER:
This website is intended to convey general information only.
The information presented here should not be
construed as formal legal advice or opinion. It is not
an offer to represent you, nor is it meant to form
a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this
site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for
advice regarding their individual legal
issues. Any email sent via the Internet using email
addresses listed in this web site would not be
confidential and would not create an attorney-client
relationship. |
| |